![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Products
Quick Links
CipherEngineStarter Kit
CipherEngine Datasheet
White PapersCipherEngine Videos
![]() Watch the video All videos Contact Us
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CipherEngine Competitive AnalysisDownload PDF VersionPrint this Page While several companies claim their products have the same benefits as CipherEngine™, none of them are able to offer the scalability, functionality and ease of use that comes with CipherEngine. For example, Cisco claims that their "GET" solution offers the same benefits as CipherEngine, but upon closer examination it is apparent that it takes several of their solutions to compare to CipherEngine (GET, DMVPN, mSEC and IPSec—point-to-point and GRE—together). Even then, their "solutions" fall short of the functionality of CipherEngine. This side-by-side comparison gives a clear indication of how CipherEngine stacks up against the competition. Key considerations: Scalability: CipherEngine scales from small to enterprise-wide networks on any type or topology. Again, GET is limited to full mesh Layer 3 networks. Implementation Type: Managed Service Providers are extremely hesitant to "touch the router" at the customer edge. CipherEngine is not router based and therefore can be easily implemented by the provider without impacting their network availability. GET is router based, thus forcing the provider to risk a downgrade in availability and reliability or install a second router behind the first router, increasing both complexity and cost. Management Ability: CipherEngine is simple to manage and deploy, infinitely more flexible and capable, and is a much lower cost solution. Like most of their “solutions”, GET is management intensive. Topology: CipherEngine works over any network topology and is completely agnostic to the customer's network design. In contrast, GET works only in a routed, fully meshed Layer 3 network. If a customer wants to build a hub-and-spoke, partial mesh or redundant point-to-point architecture, they will have to use additional complex security technologies. Transparency: CipherEngine is completely transparent to the network. On the other hand, GET is router based and in most cases will require customers to upgrade existing hardware, software and memory. Installation: CipherEngine can be installed very quickly and easily. Although GET is a simpler approach relative to past offerings, it is still limited to Layer 3 full mesh deployments with only a single policy and key. In addition, currently their solution is only available on the "T", or test train, for Cisco IOS and is not currently in production at customer sites. Side-by-Side Comparison
Bottom Line CipherEngine from CipherOptics is the only truly scalable, high-speed, low-latency network-wide encryption solution. While competitors may have solutions that compete with portions of CipherEngine’s functionality, only CipherEngine gives you full functionality and allows you to encrypt everything; regardless of network topology, design, scope, speed or scale. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright 2002-2008 CipherOptics, Inc. | All rights reserved | 1-877-878-6655 Trademark and Legal Notices | Privacy Policy | Site Map |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||